If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Many thanks George. I have to admit that sometimes I crop too tightly in the viewfinder, when I would really be better moving back a little.
Hi Stephen,
I find both shots are great & love the warm colours & atmospherics that you have captured with the late afternoon light! The one thing I liked about the 1st photo was the illusion of an arc or wide U shape created by the trees. This was omitted in 2nd shot & although great wasn't quite as aesthetically pleasing to me as 1st pic, I feel due to absence of trees framing focal point. Just my humble , subjective opinion! Great photos, beautiful building!
Hi Stephen,
I find both shots are great & love the warm colours & atmospherics that you have captured with the late afternoon light! The one thing I liked about the 1st photo was the illusion of an arc or wide U shape created by the trees. This was omitted in 2nd shot & although great wasn't quite as aesthetically pleasing to me as 1st pic, I feel due to absence of trees framing focal point. Just my humble , subjective opinion! Great photos, beautiful building!
Haha, you and I appear to be on a similar wavelength over my original picture Jocelyn
Basically what you mention is the reason I initailly went for the landscape version. However Ron (Lumix) reckoned Portrait would be better so hence the second shot
Originally posted by Lumix
I feel the image would have looked more natural in portrait mode. The main subject looks cramped and out of place in a landscape format.
Aesthetics count for a lot, unfortunately as I have said before recently, its difficult sometimes to get all the elements coming together exactly at the right time.
I would have preferred to have lost the vehicles to the left, but managed to hide them a little in the processing. Some converging verticles but thought it may have suffered for correction.
Any comments welcome
[/CENTER]
A lovely gentle image, beautiful light and shadows photographed and exposed well, Converging Verticles, I don't tend to worry too much, we can at times be too clinical, Why not try an adjusted version and see what you think?
I like it and the cars are not a dominant/detracting feature. Is this a crop? there appears to be not much room top and bottom to successfully correct converging verticals.
I saw a different version of this picture, a portrait version in the gallery section that leaves the appropriate space on the top of the building.
Personally, I prefer the landscape version with the crop of the portrait version
I saw a different version of this picture, a portrait version in the gallery section that leaves the appropriate space on the top of the building.
Personally, I prefer the landscape version with the crop of the portrait version
Regards
George
Yes that ones posted here on page 1 I think with a little more space above the first one it would have been better
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalise advertising, and to analyse site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
(darn cars)
Comment