I was very interested in the demo of Vertus Fluid Mask. It dose seem very good at removing backgrounds. As you can't save the results from the demo version, I thought I would try one with my existing software. Here is the result plus the original for comparison. What do you think.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Playing with cutouts
Collapse
X
-
Re: Playing with cutouts
I think it's a bit jagged around the beak but this could easily be smoothed out. On the whole it's pretty good.Originally posted by lumix View PostI was very interested in the demo of Vertus Fluid Mask. It dose seem very good at removing backgrounds. As you can't save the results from the demo version, I thought I would try one with my existing software. Here is the result plus the original for comparison. What do you think.
Be nice to see the same image done with VFM for comparison-------------------------
-
Re: Playing with cutouts
It dose do a better job I must admit, but then again it cost quite a bit for the plugin unlock code. May be tempted depends on whether I can convince myself I need it.Originally posted by Pops View PostI think it's a bit jagged around the beak but this could easily be smoothed out. On the whole it's pretty good.
Be nice to see the same image done with VFM for comparison
Comment
-
Re: Playing with cutouts
That's a good job indeed. How long did it take you?Originally posted by lumix View PostI was very interested in the demo of Vertus Fluid Mask. It dose seem very good at removing backgrounds. As you can't save the results from the demo version, I thought I would try one with my existing software. Here is the result plus the original for comparison. What do you think.
IanFounder/editor
Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
Comment
-
Re: Playing with cutouts
Not a bad attempt, but the Fluid Mask do have a feathered edge where the edge pixels is half transparent for soft edges and it hard for clean ones. The major difference is FM have a artificial intelligence build in, it first by auto detect the whole image, then let you decides afterwards what setting (recommendation is given after the initial process) and areas too keep or to delete.Originally posted by lumix View PostI was very interested in the demo of Vertus Fluid Mask. It dose seem very good at removing backgrounds. As you can't save the results from the demo version, I thought I would try one with my existing software. Here is the result plus the original for comparison. What do you think.
Danny
Comment
-
Re: Playing with cutouts
Took longer to re-size and post than to create. About ten minutes using the find edge tool. Should have feathered a little more but It was getting past my bed time so didn't go back to try again. VFM does offer more control but then I would expect it to.Originally posted by Ian View PostThat's a good job indeed. How long did it take you?
Ian
Comment
-
Re: Playing with cutouts
It seems to me (but I may be wrong) that some of your black fill invaded the feathers i.e. there are black spots in the feathers of the second pic which were not there (or not as big) in the first. Like the idea though and definitely a more homogenous background would improve that picture."My own suspicion is that the universe is not only stranger than we suppose, but stranger than we can suppose."
--John Haldane
Comment
-
Re: Playing with cutouts
Re-worked this with a bit more care. Time taken 25 minuets for Ian's information. Have changed background as suggested and agree this is better. Still looking into Vertus Fluid Mask. With demo version was able to achieve similar result in 9 minutes. Wish it would let you save so I could compare images side by side. Posted extra large to show cutout detail.
Comment
Comment