Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CF Cards

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CF Cards


  • #2
    Re: CF Cards

    SanDisk Ultra is what used to be the high-speed product from SanDisk. These were later replaced by Ultra II. These cards are fine for standard performance cameras, but it's probably best to aim for the Extreme III type as these will let you download from cards at the fastest rate using typical card readers or when connecting your camera to your PC. They are at the sweet spot of price/performance.

    Extreme IV cards are the highest performance cards supplied by SanDisk, but most cameras won't benefit from their performance headroom. Only the very latest cameras with UDMA support or card readers connected by FireWire 800 will show a useful increase in transfer speeds.

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

    Comment


    • #3
      Executive summary : I use cheap 2GB cards and they work fine in my 350D and new 40D
      Stuart R
      https://www.flickr.com/photos/fred-canon/

      Life is an incurable disease with a 100% mortality rate

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: CF Cards

        Originally posted by StuartR View Post
        Executive summary : I use cheap 2GB cards and they work fine in my 350D and new 40D
        Actually, your new 40D is almost certainly a camera that will benefit from UDMA (266x and faster) cards.

        Ian
        Founder/editor
        Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
        Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
        Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
        Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: CF Cards

          Ian's right about the transfer speed of course, I forgot to mention that. However, I guess for the normal amateur, waiting an extra minute or so to copy files from a card to his / her PC is not a major inconvenience?

          Just make a cup of tea while you wait

          If you're copying from a card to an external drive in the field and you need the card back in the camera quickly then maybe the card's speed could be an issue.
          Stuart R
          https://www.flickr.com/photos/fred-canon/

          Life is an incurable disease with a 100% mortality rate

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: CF Cards

            Originally posted by Ian View Post
            Actually, your new 40D is almost certainly a camera that will benefit from UDMA (266x and faster) cards.

            Ian
            I didn't know that, is the math as simple as a 266x card will write twice as fast as my 133x ?
            Stuart R
            https://www.flickr.com/photos/fred-canon/

            Life is an incurable disease with a 100% mortality rate

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: CF Cards

              Originally posted by StuartR View Post
              Ian's right about the transfer speed of course, I forgot to mention that. However, I guess for the normal amateur, waiting an extra minute or so to copy files from a card to his / her PC is not a major inconvenience?

              Just make a cup of tea while you wait

              If you're copying from a card to an external drive in the field and you need the card back in the camera quickly then maybe the card's speed could be an issue.
              Depends how big your card is. Let's say it's a 4GB card. A 66x or 80x card, like a SanDisk Ultra will transfer about 8MB/sec in real terms, or just over two minutes per GB, so nearly ten minutes for the whole card. A 133x (Extreme III) will halve that time to 5 minutes and a 266x (Extreme IV) will halve that time again to a couple of minutes or so. Double those times for an 8GB card and you realise speed matters

              Ian
              Founder/editor
              Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
              Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
              Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
              Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: CF Cards

                Originally posted by Ian View Post
                Double those times for an 8GB card and you realise speed matters

                Ian
                Agreed, but only if you're in a hurry (and have shot, in my case using a 40D, 1136 RAW images to fill the 8GB card!).

                I don't remember ever shooting more than 200 pictures in one day but there will be several on the forum who have / do shoot more than that I guess, and for them I acknowledge write speed will be more important than it is for me.

                Now, if speed affected image quality; then I would be buying the more expensive cards..
                Stuart R
                https://www.flickr.com/photos/fred-canon/

                Life is an incurable disease with a 100% mortality rate

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: CF Cards

                  Originally posted by StuartR View Post
                  Agreed, but only if you're in a hurry (and have shot, in my case using a 40D, 1136 RAW images to fill the 8GB card!).

                  I don't remember ever shooting more than 200 pictures in one day but there will be several on the forum who have / do shoot more than that I guess, and for them I acknowledge write speed will be more important than it is for me.

                  Now, if speed affected image quality; then I would be buying the more expensive cards..
                  I usually shoot RAW and JPEG and this can mean 20MB per shot

                  Ian
                  Founder/editor
                  Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
                  Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
                  Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
                  Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X