Attachment v Gallery

[Stephen]

Just to test the quality of an image shown as an attachment against one from the gallery

[Graham_of_Rainham]

Re: Attachment v Gallery

Great idea to test this. However I have a problem comparing the images as they present very differently. One is on a white background the other black and they are different sizes.

Have you drawn any conclusion yourself ?

[Stephen]

Re: Attachment v Gallery

Great idea to test this. However I have a problem comparing the images as they present very differently. One is on a white background the other black and they are different sizes.

Have you drawn any conclusion yourself ?

Apart from the fact that the large image and the attachment are the same picture but in fact different files (my mistake) I found that the attachments were being over compressed on upload, then when they opened with the black background, the physical dimensions were larger than the file uploaded. I had felt looking at images that had been attached did seem to lack the quality I had expected. The issue of over compression has now been addressed and there is minimal (5% I think) compression which is the minimum. In that sense then the exercise was worthwhile

[Autumn]

Re: Attachment v Gallery

My only observation Stephen is that the Dog Notice is clearer on the one from your gallery.

If I hadn't been trying to see "A Difference" I wouldn't have noticed. They both seem OK to me.