Hello, this thread is about switching neural networks. Don't worry it's not painful. All I mean is using our non-visual senses as well as our eyes. I've found it interesting to try to feel an images' effect before thinking or too much association kicks in.
As photographers we're weighed down with the memory of what's gone before in our work and others, and can become disembodied minds only relating to abstract aesthetics (which I love too), but by way of contrast I hope this filter will give you a fresh look at your past work and the world now.
the dictionary definition of haptic is;-
'of or relating to the sense of touch, in particular relating to the perception and manipulation of objects using the senses of touch and proprioception.
ORIGIN late 19th cent.: from Greek haptikos ‘able to touch or grasp,’ from haptein ‘fasten.’
In this thread I'm interested in Images that evoke a direct body response first rather than mental symbolic or linguistic associations. Show me what does that for you (within the bounds of forum decency;-)
since it's difficult and unnatural to isolate one sense (or association) I allow more than just touch (at a pinch!) including smell, taste and hearing as they all lead to a body-centred feeling or sensation.
What I'm finding in trawling my archive for this is that qualifying shots need not be beautiful or colourful. They seem to mostly be simple factual shots which record the substance of my environment that my body recognises. Often it is the materials in the shots that are the recording medium of some mechanical force or process. Other times they hold the potential of sensation like heat from a flame etc…
I've uploaded a bunch to my members gallery to show what I mean, from which here are two.


I guess some responses will be universal and some highly individual and look forward to seeing how this shows up. I hope you enjoy it.
Best wishes
-Silo
As photographers we're weighed down with the memory of what's gone before in our work and others, and can become disembodied minds only relating to abstract aesthetics (which I love too), but by way of contrast I hope this filter will give you a fresh look at your past work and the world now.
the dictionary definition of haptic is;-
'of or relating to the sense of touch, in particular relating to the perception and manipulation of objects using the senses of touch and proprioception.
ORIGIN late 19th cent.: from Greek haptikos ‘able to touch or grasp,’ from haptein ‘fasten.’
In this thread I'm interested in Images that evoke a direct body response first rather than mental symbolic or linguistic associations. Show me what does that for you (within the bounds of forum decency;-)
since it's difficult and unnatural to isolate one sense (or association) I allow more than just touch (at a pinch!) including smell, taste and hearing as they all lead to a body-centred feeling or sensation.
What I'm finding in trawling my archive for this is that qualifying shots need not be beautiful or colourful. They seem to mostly be simple factual shots which record the substance of my environment that my body recognises. Often it is the materials in the shots that are the recording medium of some mechanical force or process. Other times they hold the potential of sensation like heat from a flame etc…
I've uploaded a bunch to my members gallery to show what I mean, from which here are two.


I guess some responses will be universal and some highly individual and look forward to seeing how this shows up. I hope you enjoy it.
Best wishes
-Silo
I interpret this as an invitation to members to here to post photos that involve an action related to 'touch' - is that right?
,OM28mm(f2.






Comment