If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Here's the kind of high key portrait shots our theater executive director likes. This photo is for the annual student production. We need photos that will reproduce well for posters, programs and newspapers. Please comment on everything from basics through posing, etc. to help me become better at this work. The shot was taken in color and processed through ACDSee.
Here's the kind of high key portrait shots our theater executive director likes. This photo is for the annual student production. We need photos that will reproduce well for posters, programs and newspapers. Please comment on everything from basics through posing, etc. to help me become better at this work. The shot was taken in color and processed through ACDSee.
Joe
Hi joefoto,
My personal opinion on this is:
This type of photo is a complete "look at the lens, slightly turned and smile" stereotype photo. The entire photo reveals an artificial setup and look.
These type photos are not supposed to be:
1. id/ passport or driver's license photos
2. police photos of criminals or "Wanted Dead or Alive" photos
3. portrait artistic treated photos
and they cannot promote the student's talent either.
I would personally prefer, if these students were captured on some natural and different poses in some theatrical scene as background. In other words these students photos in the way they are going to be used, should show the students in their natural environment, promote better their talents and possibly reveal what is their artistic character in the play. So I think they should be photographed:
a. while acting on the play (can capture emotions, moves, reveal type of character of the play, e.t.c)
or
b. while not acting on the play, but still with some theatrical type of background (can reveal their natural type of character or of their life behind the intense lighting and without any make-up)
and as I said before in natural poses and not in fixed stereotype old-fashioned "looking straight to the lens, slightly turned and smiley"
This is my personal opinion and totally different from the theater executive director's one.
George, I thank you for your direct and specific comments. And I Agree!
In the meantime, I'll try a few as you suggest and see if I can influence her to accept something less penal. For example, photograph as more of a silhouette style and without direct eye contact. Or, horror of horrors, maybe more than just head and shoulders!
With regard to this specific shot, and within the boundaries imposed by my customer, any ideas on how to improve the result?
George, I thank you for your direct and specific comments. And I Agree!
In the meantime, I'll try a few as you suggest and see if I can influence her to accept something less penal. For example, photograph as more of a silhouette style and without direct eye contact. Or, horror of horrors, maybe more than just head and shoulders!
With regard to this specific shot, and within the boundaries imposed by my customer, any ideas on how to improve the result?
Joe
Joe,
I don't think there is much to do with this specific photo apart from adjusting the contrast to light up a little the left part of the forehead in order to distinguish the skin. That will probably enhance slightly the entire photo's contrast. Also, a very slight touch up in sharpening maybe will reveal some extra detail too.
You said the theatre director likes high key photographs, but I think an exception should be made in this case. The white background overpowers the subject's dark skin, on my monitor at least, and I would think that even more detail would be lost in the face with reproduction in a print medium which might produce an embarrassingly silhouetted effect. The same would go with a slightly bleached out white face against a dark background; reproducing it in print would exagerate bleached look.
As for pose and expression, this actually strikes me as a yearbook style portrait, though a good one. I don't know if that's what the theatre director wants, but aside from that, he looks like a happy, genial guy whose picture certainly wouldn't deter me from buying a ticket to the play. But in my opinion, I would try to lighten his face as much as possible and bring out as much detail as you can, especially for program and newspaper publication.
I reduced contrast, increased brightness, and adjusted levels. I didn't do any sharpening, as so much more detail showed up after these changes. My big concern is showing his skin tone as too much lighter than I perceived it.
But the changes make a substantial difference. Thanks for your advice.
This will certainly reproduce better than the first one. Another thing, now that I see the shadow cast by his nose, it looks like your light was too low. But it still wouldn't stop me from seeing the play.
I was fighting some flash problems throughout the shoot. When setting up, I had used a relatively short stool for the subject. But just before the cast came in, I found a much better, but taller, stool backstage and used it. I am rushed during the shoot, because this is the night of the first read-through, and the cast was just named late the prior evening. Almost all the lighting was at or below eye level, and I didn't catch it until my last shot. (mea culpa)
The shadow of the nose to his right side and the one on his neck to his left side are the more obvious tip-offs, but you can see it in the light reflections in his eyes too.
I was fighting some flash problems throughout the shoot. When setting up, I had used a relatively short stool for the subject. But just before the cast came in, I found a much better, but taller, stool backstage and used it. I am rushed during the shoot, because this is the night of the first read-through, and the cast was just named late the prior evening. Almost all the lighting was at or below eye level, and I didn't catch it until my last shot. (mea culpa)
The shadow of the nose to his right side and the one on his neck to his left side are the more obvious tip-offs, but you can see it in the light reflections in his eyes too.
Thanks for the help, Tom.
Joe
Sorry to say this, but on my monitor the 2nd photo after bringing out contrasts etc make his skin look whitewashed. His hair looks as though a plastic bag has been put over it! One eyebrow is much darker than the other. People with dark skins, or Afrique complexions have beautiful reflections to their skins unlike Caucasions, so I would prefer the first shot quite frankly, albeit a tad unreal in pose etc & not enough contrast! This is only my personal opinion!
I reduced contrast, increased brightness, and adjusted levels. I didn't do any sharpening, as so much more detail showed up after these changes. My big concern is showing his skin tone as too much lighter than I perceived it.
But the changes make a substantial difference. Thanks for your advice.
Joe
Hi Joe,
You have overdone things here. Everything is too bright and shiny to the point that details are ruined.
Give a slight kick up to the original, but just a slight one.
im not realy 1 to be giving advice,but on my comp the pic is way to bright & the hair is looking like speckled dots, & has lost alot of depth from the facial tones.i like the original but just needs as slight bit more light
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalise advertising, and to analyse site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment