Over at our other site, Four Thirds User, there has been a thread that, broadly-speaking, has been warming up the old debate about RAW versus JPEG. But Bob Ross has kind of moved it in a new direction by asking - how do you pre-visualise and prepare before taking a picture. I think his argument is that if you do your homework, you can get everything right in the camera and you will have no need for JPEG.
So - is this realistic? Is there enough time to check everything before you press the shutter release? I'm in two minds - its a great discipline to have everything perfectly set up, but I do get it wrong. This morning I took several shots outside with the white balance set for tungsten light, by accident... no problem for RAW, but very difficult to recover from for JPEG.
On the other hand, if you get everything as close to right for the shot, you will need to do less adjustment even if you use RAW and the IQ should be at its peak.
Ian
So - is this realistic? Is there enough time to check everything before you press the shutter release? I'm in two minds - its a great discipline to have everything perfectly set up, but I do get it wrong. This morning I took several shots outside with the white balance set for tungsten light, by accident... no problem for RAW, but very difficult to recover from for JPEG.
On the other hand, if you get everything as close to right for the shot, you will need to do less adjustment even if you use RAW and the IQ should be at its peak.
Ian




Comment