[SIZE=3][B]New terms and conditions mean Instagram users are in danger of giving the Facebook-owned photo-based social media service commercial rights to their photos
[/B][SIZE=2]Are you a[SIZE=2]n Instagram us[SIZE=2]er? Well, the Net is suddenly full of advice on how to download your Instag[SIZE=2]ram[/SIZE] [SIZE=2]phot[SIZE=2]os and close your Instagram account. This [SIZE=2]is an angry respo[SIZE=2]nse to Instagram's [SIZE=2]proposed change to its te[SIZE=2]rms and conditions which basically means that you will eventually g[SIZE=2]ive Instagram c[SIZE=2]ommercial rights to [/SIZE][/SIZE]any [SIZE=2]photos you upload to[SIZE=2] its ser[SIZE=2]vice[SIZE=2]. And[SIZE=2] yo[SIZE=2]u won't [/SIZE][/SIZE]get [SIZE=2]any[SIZE=2]thing in return[SIZE=2]. The new T&Cs come into force on 16th Janu[SIZE=2]ary 2013.[/SIZE]
For the record, Instagram isn't claiming o[SIZE=2]wnership or exclusive rights to your photos, just right[SIZE=2]s so[SIZE=2] that the[SIZE=2]y can use your photos for the[SIZE=2]ir ow[SIZE=2]n commercial purposes. You won't have any say in what they do with your photos.[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]
[SIZE=2]It's suggested that, to date, Faceboo[SIZE=2]k has [SIZE=2]not successfully made [/SIZE][/SIZE]Instagram make a profit. The [SIZE=2]proposed T&Cs change is c[SIZE=2]learly designed to make it eas[SIZE=2]ire for Instagram to make more money[SIZE=2].
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]It could be argued that Ins[SIZE=2]tagram[SIZE=2], being a free ser[SIZE=2]vice, is simply askin[SIZE=2]g for a little something back. [SIZE=2]And the probabi[SIZE=2]lity of one of your photos b[SIZE=2]eing [SIZE=2]exploited[/SIZE] commercially b[SIZE=2]y Instagram is very[SIZE=2] small. But for many Instagram[SIZE=2]'s strat[SIZE=2]egy [SIZE=2]is akin to a self-serving legalisation of the right to steal their images.
[SIZE=2]Facebook bought Instagram[SIZE=2] 8 months ago[SIZE=2] fo[SIZE=2]r al[SIZE=2]most a billion [SIZE=2]dollars[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]. Inst[SIZE=2]agram was just two[SIZE=2] years old but had been very successful in developing a free [SIZE=2]social media network [SIZE=2]b[SIZE=2]ased around users' p[SIZE=2]hoto[SIZE=2]s[SIZE=2], mainly uploaded [SIZE=2]via smartphone and tablet apps that enabled you t[SIZE=2]o c[SIZE=2]apture and easily [SIZE=2]stylise your photos before uploadin[SIZE=2]g them to the Instagram network.
[SIZE=2]Recently ther[SIZE=2]e has been controvers[SIZE=2]y because an Instag[SIZE=2]ram service feature which enabled your photos to be easily displayed on Twit[SIZE=2]ter was withdrawn. Now some are suggesting th[SIZE=2]at [SIZE=2]I[SIZE=2]nstagram has [SIZE=2][SIZE=2]stepped[/SIZE] over the line with its [SIZE=2]photo[SIZE=2]-[/SIZE]rights grab and that the service could receive such a backlash that the fu[SIZE=2]ture of the service might be thrown in[SIZE=2]to doubt.
[SIZE=2]I feel very strongly about the preservation of rights to one's own photogra[SIZE=2]ph[SIZE=2]y and[SIZE=2] so I will also be closing my [SIZE=2]Instagram account today. Hopefully[SIZE=2], Facebook will sit up and take not[SIZE=2]ice of t[SIZE=2]he protests. [/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]
Seen it before on things like Google Chrome in which their first T&Cs said something like "everything you type into the browser becomes our property". These companies make millions and can afford decent lawyers. They don't make "language errors" like this accidentally.
Of course they need legalese to smooth things over when one company takes over another and they need to merge the platforms, but doing it so carelessly just indicates their primary desires - that they see users as a resource to be exploited and sold.
Wasn't it the guy in charge of Facebook who said "you either pay for the product, or you are the product"?