Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is your camera diffraction limited? If so, why?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Is your camera diffraction limited? If so, why?

    It's hard to compare diffraction softness and focus blur without looking at examples back to back. I would think they would be quite similar apart from one thing -diffraction softness affects everything equally in the frame whereas focus blur will be distance-dependent.

    In the 'old' days it was obligatory to stop a lens down to get the best optical resolution, but that's not the case any more. Lens designers now know that their designs need to perform wide open, partially because maximum apertures are often smaller (darker) than they used to be - many of us would have a 50mm f/1.8 standard lens when we used film, but use of these is quite rare now, so we use zooms with maximum apertures ranging from f/2.8-6.3, typically. There is less latitude for stopping down because of brightness alone and for some of us the spectre of diffraction also comes into it. Take the new 16MP Olympus OM-D E-M5; its kit zoom has a maximum aperture of f/6.3 at the long end (50mm or 100mm FF equivalent). That's almost on the diffraction threshold for a 16MP Four Thirds sensor. Thankfully diffraction comes in gradually, so in normal circumstances you can dip below the threshold, but for more critical work you would need to rely on the lens working at its best wide open.

    Let me see if I can find some time today to provide some examples to post here.

    Ian
    Founder/editor
    Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Is your camera diffraction limited? If so, why?

      It's not been a good day today! Spent much of the day trying to stop my daughter's laptop from crashing (I think it's on its last legs - possibly ineffective thermal compound on the CPU heat sink or even the GPU heat sink, so using a CPU clock utility to slow down and under-volt the CPU), then have been wrestling with a mailing list trying to get over a hundred e-group members addresses onto address labels (still not solved that one) and then it's been cloudy and dark all day - I went out and did the E-5 (low AA) and E-30 (high AA) shots only to find when I got back that they weren't very good and one camera was set to ISO 100 and the other was set to 200. So I will defer the re-shoot until we have some decent light.

      Ian
      Founder/editor
      Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
      Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
      Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
      Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Is your camera diffraction limited? If so, why?

        Originally posted by Ian View Post
        It's not been a good day today! Spent much of the day trying to stop my daughter's laptop from crashing (I think it's on its last legs - possibly ineffective thermal compound on the CPU heat sink or even the GPU heat sink, so using a CPU clock utility to slow down and under-volt the CPU), then have been wrestling with a mailing list trying to get over a hundred e-group members addresses onto address labels (still not solved that one) and then it's been cloudy and dark all day - I went out and did the E-5 (low AA) and E-30 (high AA) shots only to find when I got back that they weren't very good and one camera was set to ISO 100 and the other was set to 200. So I will defer the re-shoot until we have some decent light.

        Ian
        Thanks for all the hard work!

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Is your camera diffraction limited? If so, why?

          I'm genuinely interested in seeing the results A 12MP Four Thirds DSLR as a third of the the resolution of a D800 in a quarter of the sensor area, so not that far off the pixel pitch of the D800 - slightly more densely populated but not by a lot, so the results should be useful. The Zuiko Digital 50mm f/2 is a tremendously sharp lens, so ideal for the job.

          Ian
          Founder/editor
          Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
          Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
          Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
          Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Is your camera diffraction limited? If so, why?

            Sunny skies pomised for today so, fingers cross, I will be able to shoot the test images for our investigation into diffraction and anti-aliasing!

            Ian
            Founder/editor
            Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
            Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
            Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
            Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Is your camera diffraction limited? If so, why?

              The sun was slightly temperamental when I went outside with tripod and cameras this afternoon - which explains some variability in the exposure as I was using delayed shutter release (Anti-Shock mode in Olympus parlance) to minimise camera vibration and the sun did get obscured by cloud for a moment by the time the exposures were made.

              But anyway - the results are here:



              Ian
              Founder/editor
              Digital Photography Now (DPNow.com)
              Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
              Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
              Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/

              Comment

              Working...
              X